FAMILY FUNCTIONS
Schiamberg (1983)
1.
Socialization of children
2.
Economic cooperation & division of labor
3.
Care, supervision, monitoring, and interaction
4.
Legitimizing sexual relations
5.
Reproduction
6.
Provision of status: Social
- familial attributes (SES, location)
Ascribed - birth order
Achieved - based on individual's effort
7.
Affecction, emotional support & companionship
FUNCTIONS
& CHARACTERISTICS OF HEALTHY FAMILIES:
CALLAGHAN (1987)
1.
clearly identified hierarchy
2.
well-defined parental roles
3.
flexibility & adaptability - Can
respond to situational & maturational crises
4.
consistent, clear rules & expectations
5.
consistent affection
6.
consistent limit-setting
7.
open communication, bi-directional
8.
increased degree of support nurturance and acceptance of family members
CHARACTERISTICS
OF DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILIES
Minuchian (1978)
1.
Rigidity - lack of flexibility
2.
Lack of individuation - emeshment /loss of autonomy
3.
Extreme detachment
4.
Scape-goating - family member (often child) who is the object of
displaced conflict/criticism
5.
Triangulation - Detouring conflict between 2 people by involving a
third person, thereby stabilizing the relationship between the original pair
6.
Faulty problem solving skills
7.
Conflict avoidance
8.
Inconsistent application of affection/discipline
9.
Low levels of support/nurturance/acceptance
10.
Increased degree of expressed hostility towards each other/other family
members
BALDWIN-SHAEFFERS
CLASSIFICATION OF FAMILY TYPES
The Baldwin-Shaeffer (1959) model is predicated on
the idea that all families will organize themselves along the dimensions of
control and affection. How a
particular family demonstrates control and affection translates into specific
parenting/child rearing techniques or procedures. Subsequently, specific child
rearing techniques directly impact upon the personality development of the
child. All families organize themselves along the dimensions of affection and
control which will result in specific child-rearing techniques, approaches,
& behaviors. The family will demonstrate a unique pattern of affection,
involvement, and supervision/ control which will influence both the
development and behavior of the child.
DIMENSIONS
OF PARENTAL BEHAHVIOR:
1. CONTROL
Parental control is conceptualized as the degree to
which parents exert control and power over the child, as well as an indicator
of the level of direct involvement in the activities of the child. It is
defined in terms of the degree of supervision/monitoring of the child's
activities, the quality, nature, consistency of discipline, and the parent's
need to control the child.
Dimensions of parent control are:
DEMANDINGNESS - The
degree to which parents will insist upon age appropriate behavior from child.
STRICTNESS - The
degree to which parents will enforce their rules AND will resist child's
attempts to
emotionally coerce parents into not carrying out punishment for
misbehavior.
INTRUSIVENESS - The
degree to which parents will interfere/control the child's activities &
interpersonal
relationships.
RESTRICTIVENESS - The
degree to which parents will limit both the range of activities in which the
child
can engage and the child's opportunities for independence (engaging in
activities
away from parents supervision).
POWER ASSERTION - The
degree to which parents will utilize the legitimate power function assigned to
the parental role in order to control the child.
2.
PARENTAL AFFECTION
Affection is defined as the amount of love, nurturance, support, and
positive value demonstrated
towards the child. The degree of affection demonstrated towards the
child may range from love-to-
indifference-to hostility.
3.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT
Involvement is defined as the degree and frequency of interaction
between parent and child, the
frequency and quality of communication between parent and child,
interest in the activities of the child,
and the quality of interaction between the parent and child. This
dimension addresses the frequency/
regularity of interaction, types of mutually-engaged activities ,
form/style of communication (linear =
Parent to Child/ transactional = bi-directional, parent <--->
child).
4.
QUALITY OF MARITAL RELATIONSHIP
The Baldwin-Shaeffer model examines the quality of
the marital relationship as an indicator of how well the family is
functioning. Research evidence indicates that marital discord adversely
affects the child and translates into specific child-rearing practices.
Conversely, high levels of marital satisfaction and communication will
generally result in consistent, positive, and healthy parent-child
relationships.
All families organize
themselves along the dimensions of affection and control which will result in
specific child-rearing techniques/approaches/behaviors. The family will
demonstrate a unique pattern of affection, involvement, and
supervision/control which will influence both the development and behavior of
the child.
AFFECTION is defined as the amount of love, nurturance,
support, and positive value demonstrated towards the child. The degree of
affection demonstrated towards the child may range from
love-to-indifference-to hostility.
INVOLVEMENT is defined as the degree and frequency of
interaction between parent and child, the frequency and quality of
communication between parent and child, interest in the activities of the
child, and the quality of interaction between the parent and child. This
dimension addresses the frequency/regularity of interaction, types of
mutually-engaged activities , form/style of communication (linear = Parent to
Child/ transactional = bi-directional, parent <---> child).
CONTROL is defined in terms of the aforementioned
characteristics of parental control, as well as including the degree of
supervision/monitoring of the child's activities, the quality, nature,
consistency of discipline, and the parent's need to control the child.
BALDWIN-SHAEFFER FAMILY TYPE
MATRIX
|
FAMILY
TYPE |
AFFECTION |
INVOLVEMENT |
CONTROL |
|
CONSISTENT DEMOCRATIC |
HIGH
|
HIGH |
LOW |
|
INCONSISTENT DEMOCRATIC |
HIGH |
MODERATE |
LOW |
|
PERMISSIVE INDIFFERENT |
MODERATELY LOW |
LOW
|
LOW |
|
INDIFFERENT DETACHED |
VERY LOW |
LOW |
LOW |
|
REJECTING NEGLECTING |
ABSENT |
LOW |
VERY LOW |
|
ANTAGONISTIC |
ABSENT |
LOW
|
HIGH |
|
AUTHORITARIAN |
LOW |
HIGH |
VERY HIGH |
|
OVERPROTECTIVE |
HIGH |
VERY HIGH |
VERY HIGH |
|
OVERINDULGENT |
HIGH |
VERY HIGH |
MODERATELY
HIGH |
BALDWIN-SHAEFFER PARENTAL BEHAVIOR MODEL
Central to this family model is the belief that
specific parental behavior results in both specific child-rearing techniques and
specific emotional and behavioral outcomes in the child. The home climate is
determined by the parent's level of affection for the child, his/her level of
involvement, and the specific control dimensions/ techniques utilized. The chart
below is a useful guide to the understanding of the inter-relationship between
parental behavior and its impact on the child.
PARENT TYPE PARENTAL
BEHAVIOR
IMPACT
|
CONSISTENT DEMOCRATIC |
HIGH
IN AFFECTION HIGH
IN INVOLVEMENT LOW IN NEED FOR CONTROL CONSISTENT ENFORCEMENT OF
RULES/DISCIPLINE |
FRIENDLY/ACTIVE/SECURE
GOAL
DIRECTED/INDEPENDENT GOOD
FRUSTRATION TOLERANCE GOOD SELF-CONTROL |
|
INCONSISTENT
DEMOCRATIC |
HIGH
IN AFFECTION MODERATELY
LOW INVOLVEMENT INCONSISTENT
ENFORCEMENT OF RULES LAX/INCONSISTENT/ABSENT DISCIPLINE |
IMPULSIVE LOW
LEVELS OF SELF-CONTROL MANIPULATIVE DIFFICULTY
WITH AUTHORITY DISOBEDIENT |
|
INDIFFERENT |
LOW
IN AFFECTION LOW
IN INVOLVEMENT LOW
LEVEL OF CONTROL LOW
LEVELS OF MONITOR/ SUPERVISION
|
POOR
IMPULSIVE CONTROL ANGRY SAD/DEPRESSED AGGRESSIVE LOW SELF-ESTEEM |
|
REJECTING NEGLECTING |
ABSENT
AFFECTION LOW
LEVELS OF INVOLVEMENT/ MONITORING/SUPERVISION LOW LEVELS OF CONTROL |
DEPRESSED LOW
SELF-ESTEEM ANGRY/AGGRESSIVE NON-COMPLIANT ACTING
OUT BEHAVIORS: RUNAWAY/DRUGS/CRIME |
|
ANTAGONISTIC |
ABSENT
AFFECTION LOW
LEVELS OF POSITIVE INVOLVEMENT
WITH CHILD HIGH NEED FOR CONTROL |
DEPRESSION LOW
SELF-ESTEEM ANGRY/SELF-PUNISHMENT INCREASED SUICIDAL RISK |
|
AUTHORITARIAN
|
LOW
AFFECTION LOW
LEVELS OF POSITIVE INVOLVEMENT
WITH CHILD HIGH
DEGREE OF CONTROL |
WITHDRAWN LOW
SELF-ESTEEM LOW
IN GOAL DIRECTION LOW
LEVELS SELF-RELIANCE LOW LEVELS INDEPENDENCE |
|
OVERPROTECTIVE |
HIGH
LEVEL OF AFFECTION HIGH
LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT/ SUPERVISION/MONITORING HIGH
DEGREE INTRUSIVENESS HIGH DEGREE RESTRICTIVENESS |
SUBMISSIVE DEPENDENT DIFFICULTY
ASSERTING NEEDS LOW
LEVELS SELF-RELIANCE LOW LEVELS INDEPENDENCE |
|
OVERINDULGENT |
HIGH
LEVEL OF AFFECTION HIGH
LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT LOW DEGREE OF DEMANDINGNESS |
IRRESPONSIBLE DIFFICULTY
SEPARATING FROM PARENTS LOW
LEVELS SELF RELIANCE LOW LEVELS INDEPENDENCE |
BAUMRIND'S MODEL OF PARENTAL BEHAVIOR
1. Baumrind
(1967;1971;1986;1991) examined the relationship between parental behavior and
children's competence. Operationally defined parenting behavior along dimensions
of CONTROL, COMMUNICATION, DEMAND FOR MATURITY,
& NURTURANCE (AFFECTION/ACCEPTANCE/SUPPORT).
Research revealed 3 parent types
and subsequent outcome on child’s behavior. Found correlation between
parenting style/personality and child’ level of social competence.
PARENT TYPE/STYLE
|
|
AUTHORITARIAN |
AUTHORITATIVE |
PERMISSIVE |
|
CONTROL |
HIGH |
HIGH |
LOW |
|
CLARITY
OF COMMUNICATION |
LOW |
HIGH |
HIGH |
|
MATURITY
DEMANDS |
HIGH |
HIGH |
LOW |
|
NURTURANCE |
LOW |
HIGH |
HIGH |
|
|
|
|
|
CHILDREN’S LEVEL OF
COMPETENCE
|
|
AUTHORITARIAN |
AUTHORITATIVE |
PERMISSIVE |
|
CHILDREN'S CHARACTERISTICS |
WITHDRAWN LACK
OF ENTHUSIASM SHYNESS
(GIRLS) HOSTILITY
(BOYS) LOW
ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION LOW
SENSE OF COMPETENCE (ABILITY) |
SELF-ASSERTIVE INDEPENDENT FRIENDLY COOPERATIVE HIGH
ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION HIGH
COMPETENCE |
IMPULSIVE LOW
SELF-RELIANCE LOW
SELF-CONTROL LOWER
LEVELS OF AGE APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AGGRESSIVENESS LACK
OF RESPONSIBILITY |
MACOBY & MARTIN'S
CLASSIFICATION OF PARENTING PATTERNS
This model is predicated on the earlier research of
Diane Baumrind (1976). According to Baumrind, parental child rearing practices
influence the child's progress towards becoming a capable adult. Parents can
foster individuation and psychological maturity by HOW they exercise and
demonstrate their authority, their affection for the child, and their interest
and involvement with the child.
Research has confirmed that patterns of parental
authority can be described in terms of how DEMANDING and RESPONSIVE parents are
towards the child. PARENTAL DEMANDINGNESS refers to establishing
expectations and rules of conduct for children and monitoring their commitment
to these expectations and their compliance with these rules. PARENTAL
RESPONSIVENESS refers to being sensitive to children's needs, being
supportive of the child's efforts, and being interested in the thoughts,
feelings, and activities of the child. Working
with these dimensions, Baumrind (1968,1971,1976) was able to demonstrate 3
separate parental styles - AUTHORITATIVE, INDULGENT, AUTHORITARIAN. It was the
further work of Macoby & Martin (1983) which identified the NEGLECTING
parent style.
AUTHORITATIVE
PARENT - These
parents are caring and warm, make appropriate demands of the child and execute
reasonable punishments for violations of rules. They tend to use inductive
discipline which involves explaining the purpose of rules, the costs for
violation of the rules, and an openness to discuss and modify the rule. Research
has found that children from these homes are self-reliant, socially competent,
and report fewer problems.
AUTHORITARIAN
PARENT - These
parents exercise firm control on the basis of power assertion. They set forth
rules in an arbitrary fashion, are more likely to make excessive demands, and to
utilize harsh punishments. Often, they believe that children should be in a
subordinate role and should have their autonomy severely limited. These parents
may be unresponsive to the needs of the child and may be low in affection for
the child. Child with authoritarian parents demonstrate lower levels of social
competence and self-reliance. Child often wants to avoid the parent from whom
he/she feels alienated.
INDULGENT
PARENT - These
parents are responsive to their children but do not place few demands or
restrictions on the child. Parents believe that complete trust in the child and
a minimal amount of restrictions is most beneficial to the parent-child
relationship. Parent's philosophy is to glorify freedom and to perceive that
restrictions limit growth. Children from these homes have been shown to have
difficulty with impulsivity and goal setting. They have been found to have more
behavior problems and a less positive orientation toward school. They may be
more socially competent & self-reliance than children from authoritarian
& neglecting homes.
NEGLECTING
PARENT - These
parents are unresponsive to the needs, feelings, and activities of the child.
They exert little control over the child and are disengaged from child rearing
responsibilities. These parents are detached from the child, indifferent to
his/her needs, display little interest in the child's activities, spends little
time in direct interaction with child. Children from these homes have been found
to have significantly more problems related to school misconduct, drug use,
delinquency, anxiety, depression, and somatic complaints. They were less
socially competent, self-reliant, received poorer grades, and have less
favorably attitudes toward school.
MACOBY & MARTIN MODEL (1983)
PARENTING STYLES AND CHILDREN'S BEHAVIOR
|
|
ACCEPTING
RESPONSIVE
CHILD-CENTERED |
REJECTING
UNRESPONSIVE
PARENT-CENTERED |
|
DEMANDING
CONTROLLING
RESTRICTIVE |
AUTHORITATIVE
RECIPROCAL
HIGH IN 2-WAY COMMUNICATION |
AUTHORITARIAN POWER ASSERTIVE |
|
UNDEMANDING
LOW IN CONTROL
PERMISSIVE |
INDULGENT
PERMISSIVE LAISSEZ-FAIRE |
NEGLECTING
INDIFFERENT
UNINVOLVED |
MACOBY & MARTIN
MODEL (1983)
PARENTING STYLES AND CHILDREN'S BEHAVIOR
PARENTAL TYPE
CHILD’S
BEHAVIOR
|
PERMISSIVE
INDULGENT
1.
Rules not enforced 2.
Rules not clearly communicated 3.
Yields to coercion by child 4.
Inconsistent discipline 5.
Few demands/expectations for mature, independent behavior 6.
Ignores/accepts misbehavior 7.
Hides annoyance/impatience/anger toward child 8. Moderate warmth |
Impulsive Aggressive Non-compliant Domineering Low
in self-reliance Low
in achievement orientation Low
self-control Low
in goal-directed activities |
|
AUTHORITARIAN 1.
Rules rigidly enforced 2.
Rules not clearly explained 3.
Does not yield to coercion 4.
Confronts & punishes bad behavior 5.
Shows anger & displeasure 6.
View of child as dominated by uncontrolled antisocial impulses 7.
Child's desires & opinions not considered or solicited 8.
Persistent in enforcement of rules in the face of opposition & coercion 9.
Harsh, punitive discipline 10.Low
in warmth & positive involvement 11.No
cultural events or mutual activities planned 12.No educational demands of standards |
Conflicted-irritable
children Fearful,
apprehensive Moody,
unhappy Easily
annoyed Passively
hostile & guileful Vulnerable
to stress Alternates
between aggressive, unfriendly
behavior & sulky Withdrawal Aimless |
|
NEGLECTING 1.
Unresponsive to child's basic needs for affection 2.
Undemanding 3.
Uninvolved in child's activities 4.
Does not monitor child 5.
Indifferent towards child 6.
May ignore child 7.
Unconcerned about child's welfare 8.
Low need/interest to control child 9.
Low effort in attempts to control child 10.Emphasis placed on importance of parent's
life. |
Depressed Low
self-esteem Feels
unloved & unlovable aggressive/angry/hostile non-compliant
|
|
AUTHORITATIVE 1.
Firm enforcement of rules 2.
Does not yield to child coercion 3.
Confronts disobedient child 4.
Shows displeasure & annoyance in response to child's bad behavior 5.
Shows pleasure & support of child's constructive
behavior 6.
Rules clearly communicated 7.
Considers child's wishes & solicits child's opinions 8.
Alternatives offered 9.
Warm, involved, responsive 10.Expects
mature, independent behavior appropriate for the child's age 11.Cultural
events & joint activities
planned 12.Educational standards set & enforced |
Energetic-friendly
children Self-reliant Self-controlled High-energy
level Cheerful/Friendly
relations with peers Copes
well with stress Interest
& curiosity in novel situations Cooperative
with adults Tractable Purposive Achievement-oriented |
BECKER'S MODEL OF
PARENTAL INFLUENCE AND DISCIPLINE
Beginning with the work of an earlier theorist,
three dimensions of parental behavior can be identified (Becker 1964).
The warmth versus hostility dimension is defined at the warm end by
accepting, affectionate, approving, understanding, child-centered, frequent use
of explanation, positive response to dependency behavior, high use of reasons in
discipline, high use of praise in discipline, low use of physical punishment,
and (for mothers) low criticism of husband.
The hostility end of the dimension is defined by the opposite
characteristics.
The restrictiveness versus permissiveness dimension
is defined at the restrictive end by: many restrictions and strict enforcement
of demands in the areas of sex play, modesty behavior, table manners, toilet
training, neatness, orderliness, care of household furniture, noise, obedience,
aggression to siblings, aggression to peers, and aggression to parents.
Anxious emotional involvement versus calm/detached
i defined at the anxious end by high emotionality in relation to child, babying,
protectiveness, and solicitousness for the child's welfare.
Anxiety in parents results from many factors,
either those directly related to their role as parents or those not connected
with their parental role. A mother
may be afraid she is not adequately prepared to be a mother.
A father may be afraid of what his child will do if he does not let the
child know (regularly) who is the boss. A
father may be a tyrant with his children because he feels threatened about
losing his job at the factory. A
mother may be indulgent because she does not want the neighbors to think she is
a cruel person.
PARENTS LOW IN LOVE-SUPPORT
(1)
NEGLECTING PARENTS with
low support, low power, and low anxiety are characterized by a lack of concern
for their children. They are
usually hedonistic and tend to leave children to their own devices.
A significant percentage of delinquents come from this type of parent.
These parents lack warmth and are either neglectful in exercising
parental control or highly inconsistent in the use of discipline.
Children raised by overly hostile and restrictive parents are more likely
to internalize their own angry feelings. They
usually exhibit aggressive and poorly controlled behavior.
(2)
RIGID CONTROLLING PARENTS
are those who have low support, high power, and low anxiety.
They are both restrictive and hostile and tend to produce
counter-hostility in their children. Under
such conditions, children tend to become neurotic.
These children are socially withdrawn, shy, anxious, and highly
self-punishing because they cannot express their hostility behaviorally.
This combination of low support, high power, and low anxiety fosters
resentment and is generally experienced as turmoil.
(3)
ANXIOUS NEUROTIC PARENTS
are those with low support, low power, and high anxiety.
They transfer their anxiety to their children.
They were probably the product of rigid controlling or hostile
authoritarian parents themselves. Their
anxieties are focused inward. They
believe the world is out to get them. Children
from these homes are motivated toward antisocial behavior; they are socially
aggressive and punitive.
(4)
HOSTILE AUTHORITARIAN PARENTS
are those with low support, high power, and high authority.
Like rigid controlling parents, they are restrictive and punitive.
Their authoritarianism, however, is primarily a result of anxiety.
They are generally frustrated people who try to appease their feelings by
striking out at their children. The
children of hostile authoritarian parents in general tend to be like those from
rigid controlling home especially, socially withdrawn and self-punishing.
PARENTS HIGH IN LOVE-SUPPORT
(1)
OVERPROTECTIVE PARENTS
with high support, high power, and high anxiety focus their control on their
children's behavior. They are quick
to respond to a child's misbehavior. They
use the threat of withdrawal of love and other emotional tactics in controlling
their child's behavior. Some of
these methods may seem irrational, but are more effective than physical
punishment. Overprotective parents usually set high standards for their
children. Their children are
compliant and dependent on their parents for approval.
They often have strong consciences to protect themselves from a
withdrawal of love.
(2)
INDULGENT PARENTS are
those with high support, low power, and high anxiety.
They set few limits or restrictions.
They are quick to remove obstacles from the child's life.
but they exert little control. They
tend to be warm, supportive and unconditionally accepting.
The children from indulgent homes are extremely independent.
They are frequently aggressive, not only toward their peers but also
toward their parents and other adults. Due
to minimal limits on behavior and an unconditional acceptance of the child, the
child does not develop a typical conscience, being non-compliant and
mischievous.
The two remaining parent types, democratic and organized effective, are
better than the other six parent types. Both
democratic and organized effective parents are low in anxiety and high in
support or love, although the organized effective parent uses high power
assertion, while the democratic parent uses power sparingly.
They will be discussed in more detail.
(3)
DEMOCRATIC PARENTS are
those with high support, low power, and low anxiety.
They are warm and supportive of their children, and like indulgent
parents, use little power and assertion. Behavior
limits and ground rules are mutually accepted, set by parents and children. Characteristics of the democratic family is the family
council with equal say and power. Democratic
and indulgent parents differ as a function of anxiety or emotional involvement.
Indulgent parents act in fear, while democratic parents express
confidence in their children and reflect an attitude of cooperation.
Democratically raised children are creative and highly independent.
Their independence is funded on confidence as opposed to
rebellion--expressed by the child from an indulgent home.
These children are socially outgoing and accepting of others.
Their sense of achievement is based on a self-rewarding structure.
Their conscience is usually based on a golden rule philosophy with
respect for the rights of others. Democratically
raised children are typically friendly, like to do their "own thing,"
and allow other the same privilege. They
have been assigned attributes such as being rowdy and lacking obedience and
submissiveness.
(4)
THE ORGANIZED EFFECTIVE PARENT
has high support, high power, and low anxiety.
Their parent-set limits are structured, but unlike the overprotective
parent, fewer limits are imposed. These
limits are rationally selected for the child's benefit.
Organized effective parents are not as intense in response to
misbehavior. They are methodical in
choosing a course of action, basing their decision on what is best for the
child. Organized effective parents
are confident, warm, supportive, and success-oriented people.
The characteristics of organized effective children are like those of
their parents. They have high achievement striving and are responsible.
They lack the independence and creativity of children from more
democratic families. Organized
effective children have a strong conscience and are compliant and respectful to
persons in power or authority. In short, they are more the model child as prescribed by our
Western civilization.
BECKER’S
PARENT TYPES BY PARENTING BEHAVIOR
|
|
Affection |
Authority |
Worry |
|
Democratic |
High support |
Low power |
Low anxiety |
|
Indulgent |
High support |
Low power |
High anxiety |
|
Organized
effective |
High support |
High power |
Low anxiety |
|
Overprotective |
High support |
High power |
High anxiety |
|
Rigid
controlling |
Low support |
High power |
Low anxiety |
|
Hostile
authoritarian |
Low support |
High power |
High anxiety |
|
Neglecting |
Low support |
Low power |
Low anxiety |
|
Anxious
neurotic |
Low support |
Low power |
High anxiety |
CHESS
& THOMAS'S PARENTING STYLE MODEL (1987)
1. Identified 6 parenting
styles based upon the behaviors a parent brings to the child rearing situation
from those that are a reaction to a child's
behavior.
2.
These
different styles will NOT determine a child's psychological development
.
3.
It
is the quality of the match between parenting behaviors and a child's
temperament that is DECISIVE.
4.
CONCEPT
OF GOODNESS OF FIT. - How well do
parent & child get along together.
5.
Poorness of fit would occur when parental demands and expectations are
excessive and are not compatible with a child's temperament and abilities.
6. Poorness of fit produces
stress and often is marked by other developmental problems. Vaughn (1992) found
a significant relationship between
infant/child's (studied 555 children, 5 months-to-42 months) temperament
and security of attachment to parents at all ages.
7. Exact mechanism of how do
child's temperament and parental behavior interact
and what will be the resulting behavior not completely
understood.
PARENT TYPES
SECURE
- These parents are confident of their techniques. If they
make a mistake, they are able to change their approach with no harm done.
They assume they will cope successfully and
look on parent as exciting.
INSECURE
- This parent believes that
everything they do inevitably influences
their child's destiny. Often feel overwhelmed
by role of parent; anything to do with child perceived as
a major stressor. Do not see
that when things go well it was
partly due to them --> external locus of control.
INTIMIDATED -
This parent demonstrates a consistent lack of ability to
be firm (strictness) with their children. Motivation to appease children
may be fear of doing a "bad job" or "not
being loved" by child OR anxiety about role of parent &
ability to perform role OR guilt about being firm & denying
child's wishes OR stress (role conflict/role overload/role
expectation).
OVER-INTERPRETIVE -
This parent feels a strong need to analyze and explore every nuance of a
child's thoughts, feelings, and actions. Feel
compelled to examine in depth the complex psychological meanings and motivations
behind their child's behavior.
VICTIMIZED
- This parent feels
betrayed, unappreciated, and as if life is
unfair when things do not work out as planned. They view child's
problems/misbehavior as proof of the unfairness of life, especially in light of
all that they have sacrificed and done for the child.
PATHOLOGICAL - This parent
suffers from some form of mental illness which interferes with their role functions of parent. This
person may not be emotionally
available to child à may not be able to provide affection, supervision, and
interaction.
RICE'S (1996) MODELS OF PARENTAL CONTROL
|
CONTROL TYPE |
PARENTAL BEHAVIOR |
IMPACT ON ADOLESCENT |
|
AUTOCRATIC |
1.
Parent makes all decisions. 2.
Expected to follow demands & decisions. 3. No
input from child sought or solicited
4.
Child not to make decisions for self. 5. May
use harsh & strict punishments. 6. May
demonstrate low levels of love, affection or approval |
1
Produce hostility & dependency 2
Resent parent control 3 Less
likely to identify with parent 4 May
become openly rebellious/aggressive/hostile 5 May
model aggressive behavior in peer relationships 6 May
become dependent as result of lack of
opportunity to make independent
decisions. |
|
AUTHORITATIVE |
1.
Parents exercise authority 2.
Demonstrate care/concern through guidance 3.
Encourage independence, responsibility,
decision-making. 4.
Parents provide reasoned explanations for
rules 5.
Adolescent encouraged to become
independent of family. 6.
Home characterized by love, respect,
acceptance, fairness, consistency,
appreciation. |
1.
Adolescent more likely to conform/adhere to
family rules. 2.
Less conflict with parents. 3.
More mature & independent decision making. 4.
Higher level of self-control & less impulsivity. 5.
More responsible & independent behavior. 6.
Greater identification with parents/less with peers. |
|
PERMISSIVE |
1.
Parents provide little guidance & direction. 2.
Receive few restrictions & expected to make
own decisions. Parents
may over indulge child & place no
limits on them 4. May
provide inadequate supervision,
monitoring/limit setting 5.
Parent maybe indifferent to child/have low affection for child. |
1.
Without limits may feel insecure. 2.
Poorly equipped to deal with impulses/ frustrations or to act
in responsible manner. 3. May
become impulsive/self-centered/ irresponsible. 4.
May interpret lack of control as disinterest or
rejection. |
|
INFLEXIBLE |
1.
Parents are unyielding/refuse to change
ideas & behavioral responses. 2.
Will not discuss different points of view or allow disagreements. 3.
Expect children to act, think, and be alike. 4. Are
perfectionistic with high levels of expectations. 5.
Highly critical and often display their displeasure towards child. 6. May
have age inappropriate expectations for children. May expect child to take
on more responsibility than ready or may continue to keep child dependent
by denying age appropriate opportunities. |
1. May
develop high levels of anxiety centering around a belief
of not being good enough. 2. May
try to become people pleasers to avoid or reduce
criticism of parent. 3. May
develop poor self-concept & l low
self- esteem as a
result of constant criticism. |
|
ERRATIC/ INCONSISTENT |
1.
Fail to provide consistency in discipline or control. 2.
Fluctuate in control style. 3.
Parents may disagree about discipline techniques/form/need to discipline. 4.
Father may exercise more authority/control over sons. 5.
Mother may exercise more authority/control over daughters. |
1.
Greater risk for impulsive, poorly self-controlled child. 2. May
not be able to anticipate consequences of their actions. 3.
More disobedience & conflict with parents. 4.
Lacking clear guidelines may become confused & insecure. |
SMITH'S (1988) MODEL OF
PARENTAL CONTROL
In his research on parental
control techniques, Smith (1988) outlined seven methods of control. He based his
model on the observations of 1109 parent-adolescent encounters of 109 mothers
and 88 fathers. The methods of control were:
1. POWER ASSERTION:
Parent used physical punishment, deprivation, &
threats.
2.
COMMANDS:
Parent used imperative statements not accompanied by
punishment or overt threats
of punishment.
3.
LOVE WITHDRAWL: Parent punishes or
threatens to punish a child by means
of temporary coldness or
rejection.
4.
SELF-ORIENTED INDUCTION: Parent
suggested possible gains or costs the child might experience as a
result of a choice
made or behavior demonstrated.
5.
OTHER-ORIENTED INDUCTION: Parent suggested religious/ethical reasons,
attraction/approval of others, or
personal obligations as reasons for a choice to be made or behavior
demonstrated.
6.
ADVICE:
Parent suggested to child how he/she may more efficiently, effectively,
or easily accomplish what is
desired by parent.
7. RELATIONSHIP
MAINTENANCE: Parent appeals to the child to maintain
positive orientation toward the parent.
The study found that relative
frequency of parental control techniques used were:
command
34%
self-oriented
induction
31%
advice
14%
relationship
maintenance
10%
power assertion
8%
other-oriented
induction
1%
love withdrawal
1%
These findings are important
because research generally indicates that:
1. Parental explanations
& reasoning (induction) are strongly associated with the child internalizing
ethical and moral principles.
2. Use of physical
punishment, deprivation, and power assertion (threats) is associated with
children's aggression, hostility, and delinquency.