DISABILITY RIGHTS ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA:
ELITE NEWS MEDIA COVERAGE
OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
By Beth Haller
Doctor of Philosophy
Temple University, 1995
Advisor: Dr. Thomas F. Gordon
This dissertation undertook a content analysis of U.S. elite newspapers and the
three major news magazines (N=524), news photographs (N=171), and TV network
news (N=24) to understand how the news media presented the 1990 Americans with
Disabilities Act. The Act embodies a new civil rights issue that sharply contrasts with
stereotypes and myths about people with disabilities. Therefore, this study could assess
how the news media juxtapose the newer disability rights perspective relative to older
stereotypes of the disability experience and competing perspectives such as U.S.
business interests. This study also assists in the understanding of the news media role in
characterizing a new issue on the public's agenda.
The findings show that the elite media covered the ADA in the obligatory way it
has covered much major federal legislation. Only rarely did media further contextualize
and expand ADA information. The coverage of the ADA illustrates that the notion of
disability rights is only making a moderate amount of headway into news media
representations. However, when they did do stories, the news media did a good job of
casting the ADA as a civil rights act. But they also presented the norms of U.S. society
and the business community by looking often at the upfront cost of the Act, as opposed
to long-term cost savings the Act might provide.
But the news media misrepresented disability in incidence, race, and gender.
They sought out the visible disabilities as examples and missed the fact that more
people have hidden disabilities. They portrayed disability in terms of the white middle
class, which reflects the primary composition of the disability rights movement.
The nature of the ADA story, however, did not allow the media to use the
traditional stereotypes, which present people with disabilities as medical problems or as
superhuman. The media accepted a progressive frame of minority group status for
people with disabilities because the federal government gave it to them. And because
the governmental rhetoric had been fashioned by activists from the disability
community, the message of civil rights for people with disabilities flowed through the
media.