ANTH 207.003: CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

MWF, 11-11:50 am

LI-316

 

Samuel G. Collins

Li-318A, x3199

scollins@towson.edu

pages.towson.edu/scollins

 

Office Hours:

Mondays and Wednesdays, 1:30-3:00 pm

 

class description:

 

The interpenetration of national borders characteristic of globalization no longer allows us the luxury of remaining within an insular, ethnocentric world.  Our success and survival depends upon understanding the powerful forces that shape these cultural ecologies.  How do we make sense of this fecund growth of meaning and identity, this increasingly heterogeneous world?  Why, through anthropology, of course. 

 

In fact, globalization makes us all nonce anthropologists, practitioners of what contributors to one of our class texts call “zafimaniry anthropology,” i.e., broad speculations on life drawing upon (occasionally specious) comparisons between different groups of people.  In this course, we will draw upon multiple, ethnographic examples in our own “zafimaniry” anthropologies concerning questions of life, love, belief, identity, hopes and fears, in the process interrogating our understanding of both ourselves and the people around us. 

 

Anthropology has been called "a critique of common sense," a description that highlights anthropologys critical role in a contemporary world characterized by both inequality and a studied lack of understanding: i.e., as a "gadfly" discipline that challenges the ways in which we think and understand. By reflexively discomfiting "common sense," social and cultural categories in the perception of difference, anthropology opens a middle ground between "self" and "Other," "rationality" and "emotion," "politics" and "ritual." That middle ground is the locus of connections between discursive and geographic orders, potentially powerful sites allowing us to perceive the linkages between not only institutions and ways of knowing, but between places in the multiplying networks of global society.

 

In this class, we will consider all aspects of cultural anthropology, both historically (from the 18thcentury to the present) and synchronically, in the careful analysis of case studies and ethnographic films. Our goals are threefold: 1) to map the space of cultural anthropology as an academic discipline; 2) to make thematic and epistemological connections between anthropology and other academic disciplines; and 3) to understand the relevance of cultural anthropology for everyday, modern life.

 

Upon successful completion of this course, engaged students should be able to:

·         Identify and explain key concepts, theories and debates in contemporary, cultural anthropology.

·         Connect social and cultural practices to larger contexts of politics, economics, and power. 

·          Apply anthropological perspectives to critique ethnocentric assumptions and to address contemporary, human problems.

·         Effectively communicate anthropological findings learned in the course. 

 

 

required readings:

The following texts are available in the campus bookstore:

 

Astuti, Rita, Jonathan Parry and Charles Stafford, eds. (2008).  Questions of Anthropology.  NY: Berg Publishers.

 

Rofel, Lisa (2007).  Desiring China.  Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 

 

graded assignments

attendance Attendance in this course is required. Here's how it works: students begin the course with an "A" in attendance but, for each class missed, lose two points. However: each student can miss two "grace classes" before being penalized. 30 pts.

Assignments (deadlines announced) Utilizing readings and media from class, students will produce “zafimaniry” anthropologies comparing their own experiences with those of people described in course readings, films and discussions.  During the semester, students will produce four (4) two-page comparisons.  A style sheet for the assignment will be posted. 60 pts.

midterm exam (March 4) The first exam will test both your knowledge and understanding with a battery of multiple choice, "True-False" and “fill-in-the-blank” questions. 60 pts

final exam The final examination will measure your apprehension of ideas and theories from lectures, readings and films through a series of short answer questions. 50 pts

 

class grading

Your final grade will be computed by adding together the following point values for graded assignments and examinations:

 

Attendance:      30 pts.

Assignments:      60 pts.

Midterm Exam:  60 pts.

Final Exam:       50 pts.

                        _____

                        200 pts.

 

A 186+

A- 180-185

B+ 174-179

B 166-173

B- 160-165

C+ 154-159

C 140-153

D+ 134-139

D 120-133

F <120

 

class schedule:

1st Week Introduction to the course and explanation of syllabus.

(1/26-1/30) What is cultural anthropology?

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 337-361.

 

2nd Week Fundamental Concepts

(2/2-2/6) Assigned Reading: Astuti, 307-335.

February 3: Change of Schedule period ends.

 

3rd Week Globalization and Multiple Modernities

(2/9-2/13) Film: A New Day in Old Sana’a (2005)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 55-76.

Rofel, pp. 1-30

 

4th Week Ritual Life

(2/16-2/20) Film: Zen Buddhism: In Search of Self (2002)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, 105-136

Rofel, pp. 31-64.

 

5th Week Family and Kinship

(2/23-2/27) Film: Qiu Yue (2007)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 29-54

Rofel, pp. 65-84


 

6th Week Midterm Examination

(3/2-3/6)

 

7th Week Ideology and Cultural Acquisition, Part I

(3/9-3/13) Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 1-28.

Rofel, pp. 85-110

 

8th Week  Spring Break

(3/16-3/20)

 

9th Week Ideology and Cultural Acquisition, Part II

(3/23-3/27) Film: Coffee Prince (2006)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 55-75

 

10th Week Work and Life

(3/30-4/3) Film: My Name is Kim Sam-soon (2004)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 137-166

Rofel, pp. 111-134

 

11th Week  Magic and Religion

(4/6-4/8) Film: Witches in Exile (2005)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 77-104

Rofel, pp. 135-156

April 6: Last day to withdraw.

 

12th Week: Anthropologies of Science

(4/13-4/15) Astuti, pp. 197-226

Rofel, pp. 157-196

 

13th Week Death and Life

(4/20-4/24) Film: Big Shot’s Funeral (2001)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 227-248

 

14th Week Anthropological Interventions

(4/27-5/1) Film: Maquilapolis (2006)

Assigned Reading: Astuti, pp. 249-280

 

15th Week Cultural Critique

(5/4-5/8)

 

16th Week Review

(5/11)

 

 

notes

1. Although exams and graded work will remain as stated above, I may have to change different

readings or films on the syllabus throughout the semester. I will, in any case, try to give you

ample warning of any syllabus changes.

 

2. Cheating and Plagiarism policy:  Our department has the following policy on academic dishonesty:

The faculty of the Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Criminal Justice take a strong stand against Academic Dishonesty of all forms.  Academic dishonesty will not be tolerated in any class.  It includes, but is not limited to, any form of cheating or unapproved help on an exam or academic exercise, copying someone else’s written work without citation, presenting fabricated information as legitimate, any unauthorized collaboration among students, or assisting someone to cheat in any way.  All students have the ethical responsibility for doing their own work.  A student who is uncertain about whether or not something constitutes academic dishonesty in a particular class has the obligation to see their instructor for clarification.  Consistent with university policy, the minimum penalty for academic dishonesty in any form is determined by the individual faculty member in each class, and may consist of “a reduced grade (including “F” or zero) for the assignment; a reduced grade (including “F”) for the entire course,” or other options as stipulated in Appendix F of the Undergraduate Catalog.  Students who are charged with academic dishonesty must remain enrolled in the course and cannot withdraw.  Instructors who make the determination that academic dishonesty has occurred will notify the student in writing of the finding, the penalty, and the process for appeal.  The same written notice will be forwarded to the Office of Judicial Affairs on campus, the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts, and to the Chair’s Office in the department.  Academic Dishonesty undermines the legitimate efforts of students and involves serious repercussions.  The faculty of the department urge all our students to act with integrity with regard to work submitted.    (Approved Spring 2004)

 

In addition, Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the University’s policy:

http://wwwnew.towson.edu/provost/resources/studentacademic.asp

 

At a minimum, students who plagiarize in this class will receive an “F” for the assignment. 

 

3. Students who have, or suspect that they may have, a disability should seek services through Disability Support Services.  Students must be registered with DSS and receive written authorization to obtain disability-related accommodations.  If you need accommodation due to a disability, please visit DSS for guidance.  The office is located at 7720 York Road, AD 232, Ph: 4-2638 or 3475.

 

4. Students may not repeat this course more than once (make a third attempt at this course) without the prior approval of the Academic Standards Committee.  Please call 4-4351 or visit ES 235 for more information.

 

5. Late assignments: Late assignments will be accepted at ½ credit (1-2 days late) or ¼ credit (3-4 days late).  After 4 days, late assignments will no longer be accepted.

 

6. Make-up Work: Under extraordinary circumstances, documented by physicians, police, etc., students may be allowed to make-up missed work.

 

7. Students who are disruptive may be dismissed from class.

 

explanation of grading

explanation of grading

Consistent with University policy, the following grades will be assigned according to the designated criteria:

A: A superior performance surpassing assigned work in unique and novel ways and

integrating diverse ideas from a wide range of sources in addition to those discussed in class.

A-

B+

B: Excellent work surpassing the expectations of the assignment and demonstrating initiative

and a willingness to move beyond the basic requirements of the assigned work.

B-

C+

C: Satisfactory work meeting all basic requirements of the assignment.

D+

D: Work in some way less than satisfactory. Although conforming to basic requirements in

some way, the completed work is nevertheless not a coherent response to the

assignment.

F: A profoundly unsatisfactory performance which doesn't meet

the intent of the assignment at any level.