ANTH 210.001 HONORS INTRODUCTION TO CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

 

(한국 문화를 통해 처음 만나는 문화 인류학)

 

 

MWF, 10-10:50 am

Li-009

 

Samuel G. Collins

Li-318A, x3199

scollins@towson.edu

pages.towson.edu/scollins

 

Office Hours:

Mondays and Wednesdays, 2-3:30 pm

 

class description:

 

Globalization was supposed to result in a homogeneous world grounded in global media, corporate retail and fast-food.  Instead, the opposite seems to have happened: “culture,” far from becoming subordinated to rational choice, increasingly proliferates along transnational scapes.  Moreover, the interpenetration of national borders characteristic of globalization no longer allows us the luxury of remaining within an insular, ethnocentric world.  Our success and survival depends upon understanding the powerful forces that shape these cultural ecologies.  How do we make sense of this fecund growth of meaning and identity, this increasingly heterogeneous world?  Why, through anthropology, of course. 

 

That said, the temptation is to look for explanations of the world that utilize a short-hand of stereotypes and mythologies to confirm what we think we already know without actually discomfiting our pre-existing vision of the world—this is the way news media typically present cultural alterity.

 

In contrast, this course is an introductory study of anthropological concepts, theories and methods that simultaneously introduces an anthropological understanding of Korean culture.  In other words, this is the polar opposite of the kind of shallow understandings of the world encouraged by global media, an introduction to anthropology through the lens of a single case study.

 

In this course, we will endeavor to study Korea through history, music, food and through images—the movies and television that make up the “Korean wave” (hallyu).  Using as our template the “study of culture at distance” pioneered by anthropologists during World War II, we will analyze contemporary Korean film and television through the lens of anthropology: gender, class, kinship, family, politics and, ultimately, the experience of modernity itself. 

 

By reflecting upon Korea in this more complex and nuanced way, we open a middle ground between "self" and "Other," "rationality" and "emotion," "politics" and "ritual." That middle ground is the locus of connections between discursive and geographic orders, potentially powerful sites allowing us to perceive the linkages between not only institutions and ways of knowing, but between places in the multiplying networks of global society.

 

Accordingly, our objectives are five-fold:

1) to map the space of cultural anthropology as an academic discipline;

2) to make thematic and epistemological connections between anthropology and other academic disciplines;

3) to apply anthropological theories and concepts to Korean social life and culture in the context of modernity and modernization;

4) to communicate these understandings through examinations, oral reports and essays; and 

5) to reflexively (and critically) apply these ideas to one’s own life. 

 

Learning Goals:

Upon satisfactory completion of this course, students should be able to:

·       summarize the major goals of cultural anthropology and identify contemporary trends in the field. 

·       demonstrate an anthropological understanding grounded in the apperception of sociohistorical contexts in written work (quizzes, exams, papers) as well as in oral work (presentations, discussions). 

·       Finally, they will be able to demonstrate through papers and in-class presentations an in-depth understanding of Korea and Korean modernity. 

 

required readings:

The following texts are available in the campus bookstore:


Abelmann, Nancy (2003).  The Melodrama of Mobility.  Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

 

Kim, Choong Soon (2007).  Kimchi and IT.  Seoul: Ilchokak. 

 

In addition, articles will be assigned from online journals available through Cook Library, including American Ethnologist, Critique of Anthropology, positions, Korea Journal and others.

 

 

graded assignments

attendance Attendance in this course is required. Here's how it works: students begin the course with an "A" in attendance but, for each class missed, lose two points. However: each student can miss two "grace classes" before being penalized. 20 pts.

Quizzes and homework

Students will (occasionally) undertake activities related to readings and lectures, including group discussions, films and out-of-class assignments. 4-5 quizzes will be given over the course of the semester to evaluate reading comprehension. 30 pts.

Midterm exam (October 22) The first exam will test both your knowledge and understanding of both anthropological concepts and their application with a series of short answer questions on readings, films and lectures. 50 pts

semester paper (December 3) Using our ethnography, The Melodrama of Mobility, as a touchstone, students will write an original paper analyzing Korean life and identity using both anthropological theory and additional sources from class.  Students will receive a style sheet for the paper during the first week of October, with the final paper due in the first week of December.  50 pts. 

final exam The final examination will measure your ability to synthesize and communicate ideas and theories from lectures, readings and films through a series of short answer questions. 50 pts

 

class grading

Your final grade will be computed by adding together the following point values for graded assignments and examinations:

 

Attendance:                            20 pts.

Homework/ Quizzes:              30 pts.

Midterm Exam:                       50 pts.

Research Project:                    50 pts.

Final Exam:                             50 pts.

                                                _____

                                                200 pts.

 

A 186+

A- 180-185

B+ 174-179

B 166-173

B- 160-165

C+ 154-159

C 140-153

D+ 134-139

D 120-133

F <120

 

class schedule:

1st Week Introduction to the course and explanation of syllabus.

(9/3-9/5) What is cultural anthropology?

Assigned Reading: Geertz, Clifford (1974).  “From the Native’s Point of View”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.  Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28(1): 26-45.  [JSTOR]

 

2nd Week Anthropological Subfields

--Korea, Genetically, Archaeologically and Linguistically

(9/8-9/12) Assigned Reading: Kim, 1-46.

Browse the Korean government’s website materials for the study of Korean (free): http://www.interedu.go.kr/

And this Seoul-based non-profit (free):

http://prkorea.com/english/e_learn/e_learn1_1.htm

Film: Dae Jang Geum

 

September 10: Change of Schedule period ends.

 

3rd Week Globalization and Multiple Modernities

--Korean History, Modernity

(9/15-9/19) Assigned Reading: Kim, 47-72

Film: Dae Jang Geum

 

4th Week Modernity and Modernization

--Korean capitalism, development and globalization

(9/22-9/26)   Assigned Reading: Kim, 73-108.

Abelmann, 1-32

Film: Dae Jang Geum

 

5th Week Kinship and Marriage

(9/29-10/3) Assigned Reading: Kim, 109-142

Abelmann, 33-58

Film: My Lovely Sam-Soon
 

6th Week Conceptualizing Culture

(10/6-10/10) Assigned Reading: Kim, 143-178.

Abelmann, 59-99

Cho, Hae-Joang (2005).  Reading the “Korean Wave” as a Sign of Global Shift.  Korea Journal 45(4): 147-182.  [http://www.ekoreajournal.net/]

Film: My Lovely Sam-Soon

 

7th Week Magic and Religion

(10/13-10/17) Assigned Reading: Kim, 179-218.

Abelmann, 100-131

Friedman, Sara L. (2006).  Watching Twin Bracelets in China.  Cultural Anthropology 21(4): 603-632.  [JSTOR]

Film: My Lovely Sam-Soon

 

8th Week  Midterm Examination

(10/20-10/24) Assigned Reading: Kim, 249-280

Abelmann, 132-163

Film: My Lovely Sam-Soon

 

9th Week Culture Change and Acquisition (con.)

(10/27-10/31) Assigned Reading: Kim, 281-316

 Abelmann, 164-186

Yoon, Kyongwon (2006).  The Making of Neo-Confucian Cyberkids.  New Media & Society 8(5): 753-771.  [Academic Search]

Film: My Lovely Sam-Soon

 

10th Week  Identity and Self—Ideology and Hegemony

(11/3-11/7) Assigned Reading: Kim, 317-340

Film: “Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter and Spring” (2003)

Abelmann, 187-213

Harrison, Faye (1998).  Introduction: Expanding the Discourse on “Race”.  American Anthropologist 100(3): 609-631.  [JSTOR]

Film: Coffee Prince

 

11th Week:  Governmentalities and the Neoliberal

(11/10-11/14) Assigned Reading, Abelmann, 214-239

Film: Coffee Prince

 

12th Week Self and Other

(11/17-11/21) Assigned Reading: Abelmann, 240-280

 Appadurai, Arjun (1988).  How to Make a National Cuisine.  Comparative Studies in Society and History 30(1): 3-24.  [JSTOR]

Film: Coffee Prince

 

13th Week Transnationalism and Korean Americans

(11/24) Assigned Reading: Abelmann, 281-294

 Film: Coffee Prince

 

14th Week Ethnography and Representation

(12/1-12/5) Assigned Reading: Article TBA

 

 

15th Week Class Presentations

Assigned Reading: Article TBA

(12/8-12/12)

 

16th Week Review

(12/15)

 

 

notes

1. Although exams and graded work will remain as stated above, I may have to change different

readings or films on the syllabus throughout the semester. I will, in any case, try to give you

ample warning of any syllabus changes.

 

2. Cheating and Plagiarism policy:  Our department has the following policy on academic dishonesty:

The faculty of the Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Criminal Justice take a strong stand against Academic Dishonesty of all forms.  Academic dishonesty will not be tolerated in any class.  It includes, but is not limited to, any form of cheating or unapproved help on an exam or academic exercise, copying someone else’s written work without citation, presenting fabricated information as legitimate, any unauthorized collaboration among students, or assisting someone to cheat in any way.  All students have the ethical responsibility for doing their own work.  A student who is uncertain about whether or not something constitutes academic dishonesty in a particular class has the obligation to see their instructor for clarification.  Consistent with university policy, the minimum penalty for academic dishonesty in any form is determined by the individual faculty member in each class, and may consist of “a reduced grade (including “F” or zero) for the assignment; a reduced grade (including “F”) for the entire course,” or other options as stipulated in Appendix F of the Undergraduate Catalog.  Students who are charged with academic dishonesty must remain enrolled in the course and cannot withdraw.  Instructors who make the determination that academic dishonesty has occurred will notify the student in writing of the finding, the penalty, and the process for appeal.  The same written notice will be forwarded to the Office of Judicial Affairs on campus, the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts, and to the Chair’s Office in the department.  Academic Dishonesty undermines the legitimate efforts of students and involves serious repercussions.  The faculty of the department urge all our students to act with integrity with regard to work submitted.    (Approved Spring 2004)

 

In addition, Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the University’s policy:

http://wwwnew.towson.edu/provost/resources/studentacademic.asp

 

3. Students with learning disabilities should register at the Disability Support Services Office.  DSS will contact me with necessary accommodations. 

 

4. Late homework: Late homework assignments will be accepted at ½ credit (1-2 days late) or ¼ credit (3-4 days late).  After 4 days, late homeworks will no longer be accepted.

 

5. Make-up Work: Under extraordinary circumstances, documented by physicians, police, etc., students may be allowed to make-up missed work.

 

6. Students who are disruptive may be dismissed from class.


7. This course may be repeated only once without the prior permission of the Academic Standards Committee.

 

 

explanation of grading

explanation of grading

Consistent with University policy, the following grades will be assigned according to the designated criteria:

A: A superior performance surpassing assigned work in unique and novel ways and

integrating diverse ideas from a wide range of sources in addition to those discussed in class.

A-

B+

B: Excellent work surpassing the expectations of the assignment and demonstrating initiative

and a willingness to move beyond the basic requirements of the assigned work.

B-

C+

C: Satisfactory work meeting all basic requirements of the assignment.

D+

D: Work in some way less than satisfactory. Although conforming to basic requirements in

some way, the completed work is nevertheless not a coherent response to the

assignment.

F: A profoundly unsatisfactory performance which doesn't meet

the intent of the assignment at any level.