ANTH 380.001 ethnographic field methods: the practice of theory
| instructor: Samuel Collins
MW, 12:30-1:45 Li-005 |
office hours: Mondays and Wednesdays, 3:30-4:30 p.m. Fridays, 1-3 pm, or by appointment Room Li-318A Phone: x3199 (e-mail) scollins@towson.edu homepage: www.towson.edu/~scollins
|
course description
Ethnographic fieldwork has remained in dialectical tension with anthropological theory for over
100 years. It is, therefore, the "practice of theory." The highly experiential world of
ethnographic research has the power to "penetrate" abstractions of social theory--illuminating,
adumbrating, undermining. Of course, ethnography is not just naive empiricism. It is theory that
directs the course of ethnographic fieldwork for, in the words of one anthropologist, a "way of
seeing" is simultaneously a way of "not seeing," i.e., aspects of life selected through theory
require an anthropologist to ignore other, possibly puissant, areas of social and cultural life.
"Anthropological theory" and "ethnographic fieldwork" move together, one opening up a critical
space while another reveals a limit; one unveiling a contradiction while another engenders new
possibilities and so on
On another level, ethnographic fieldwork is a way of knowing intimately related to everyday life, a
method that is very much an extension of our quotidian, phenomenological experience. Whenever
we travel, begin a new job or attend a new school, we engage in something very much like
ethnographic research. So although fieldwork is very much imbricated by questions of
anthropological theory, it is also part of the everyday aesthetics of living. In Paul Willis’s words,
art is "a defining and irreducible quality at the heart of everyday human practices and interactions"
(3). In our interpretations of everyday life, we will need to tap into our artistic sensibilities of the
everyday. This course will, fittingly, adopt multiple perspectives on ethnographic research. On the one
hand, we will consider ethnography’s relationship--historical and theoretical--to cultural
anthropology. We will consider the historical development of ethnography from early
experiments in the mid-nineteenth century up to the present and link those putatively
methodological developments to theoretical debates (then and now) in cultural anthropology.
We will also review experimentation in ethnographic methods as sometimes oblique challenges to
anthropology’s status quo. But we will also engage a great deal in the practice of ethnographic research,
structuring class activities that bridge the gaps between everyday understanding and experiential, ethnographic
knowledge. Additionally, students will take the first steps towards their own ethnography,
following the building blocks of ethnographic research from the initial proposal through the initial
site survey.
course objectives
1). Students will understand ethnographic methodology as arising in a context of anthropological
theory.
2). Students will study contemporary (and even experimental) methodologies through careful
readings of ethnographies.
3). Students will become familiar with qualitative methods germane to the anthropological
encounter: participant observation, interviews, life stories and visual anthropology.
4). Students will design an ethnographic project, set up research instruments and attempt
nonintrusive observations.
required reading:
Doyle, Arthur Conan, Sir. The Sign of Four. Urbana, Illinois (USA): Project Gutenberg Etext #2097.
-First release: Mar 2000. http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext00/sign410.txt
Emoff, Ron and David Henderson, eds.. Mementos, Artifacts and Hallucinations from the Ethnographer's Tent. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Gates, Hill. Looking for Chengdu. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.
graded assignments
In-Class Assignments (Due on assigned days) Students will each complete two, in-class
"projects" over the course of the semester. Projects will include 1) books reports; 2) acting as an
informant for "in-class" ethnographies; 3) engaging in and reporting on truncated instances of
"fieldwork" inside or outside the class. We’ll begin in-class assignments during week 2.
Research Proposals (Due September 24) Students must write a one-page description of their
proposed ethnographic research project. Proposals should answer the journalistic 4 Ws and 1 H
(Who, What, Where, When, Why and How).
Historical/Background Research (Due November 5) Students must complete a five (3) page
background report on their research site. Essays should both contextualize and historicize the
site, using relevant historical and archival sources. Students should show how their particular
research question arises out of problems germane to the research site.
Oral Reports (Last 2 weeks of class) Students will briefly summarize their ethnographic findings, highlighting
areas for future ethnographic work.
Ethnographic Reports (December 10) Using a modified (and less intrusive) form of participant
observation, students will spend between 2-4 weeks engaged in ethnographic research, after
which they will write a report summarizing method and analyzing data (however perfunctory) in
the light of the aforementioned Historical/Background Research. I will be handing out more
precise research guides later in the semester.
Final Examination (December 17) Students will demonstrate their knowledge of class themes and
readings by answering a battery of true-false, multiple choice and short answer questions.
Grading
In-class assignments: 60 pts.
Research proposal: 20 pts.
Background paper: 40 pts.
Oral Report: 20 pts.
Ethnographic report: 40 pts.
Final examination: 20 pts.
Explanation of Grading:
A+ 186+
A- 180-185
B+ 174-179
B 166-173
B- 160-165
C+ 154-159
C 146-153
C- 140-145
D+ 134-139
D 120-133
F <120
class schedule:
1st Week Introduction to the course and explanation of syllabus.
(8/27)
2nd Week Ethnographer and Flaneur
(9/3) Film: "The Sign of Four" (1988)
Assigned Reading: Doyle, "The Sign of Four"
3rd Week Varieties of Ethnographic Research.
(9/8-9/10) Assigned Reading: Emoff and Henderson, pp. 17-29, 61-79
SEPTEMBER 9: Change of Schedule Period Ends
In-class assignments begin
4th Week The History of Anthropological Fieldwork
(9/15-9/17) Assigned Reading: Emoff and Henderson, pp. 179-198
Gates, pp. 1-24
September 17: Research Proposals Due
5th Week Contemporary Anthropological Fieldwork
(9/22-9/24) Assigned Reading: Emoff and Henderson, pp. 155-177
Gates, pp. 25-47
September 24: Research Proposals Due
6th Week Challenges to the Anthropological Episteme
(9/29-10/1) Assigned Reading: Emoff and Henderson, pp. 81-100
Gates, pp. 48-80
7th Week Foundations of Ethnographic Research: Global histories in situ
(10/6-10/8) Library Research Methods
Assigned Reading: Emoff and Henderson, pp. 101-116
Gates, pp. 81-108
8th Week Fieldwork: "A Predicament Turned Into a Method."
(10/13-10/15) Assigned Reading: Emoff and Henderson, pp. 45-59
Gates, pp. 109-138
9th Week
(10/20-10/22) Assigned Reading: Gates, pp. 139-166
10th Week The Secret Lives of Informants
(10/27-10/29) Emoff and Henderson, pp. 31-44, 131-153
11th Week The Secret Lives of Informants
(11/3-11/5) Assigned Reading: Gates, pp. 167-187
November 7: Last Day to Withdraw with a Grade of "W"
November 5: Background Essays Due
12th Week Participant Observation
(11/10-11/12) Assigned Reading: Gates, pp. 191-216
13th Week Scratchnotes, Fieldnotes and Journals
(11/17-11/19) Assigned Reading: Gates, pp. 217-246
14th Week Varieties of Interviews
(11/24) November 26-30: THANKSGIVING BREAK
15th Week Building Ethnographic Theory
(12/1-12/3) Oral Reports
16th Week Oral Reports
(12/8-12/10) December 12: LAST DAY OF CLASSES
December 17: Final Examination, 12:30 p.m. -2:30 p.m.
December 10: Final Projects Due
notes
1. Although exams and graded work will remain as stated above, I may have to change
different readings or films on the syllabus throughout the semester. I will, in any case, try to give
you ample warning of any syllabus changes.
2. Each student should be familiar with the University’s rules regarding cheating and
plagiarism (Towson University Undergraduate Catalog, Appendix F). Neither will be tolerated in
my class and will result in a flunking grade.3. Students with learning disabilities should register at the Disability
Support Services
Office.
explanation of grading
Following department policy, students will be assigned a letter grade without a qualifying "+" or
"-".
A: A superior performance surpassing assigned work in unique and novel ways and
integrating diverse ideas from a wide range of sources in addition to those discussed in
class.B: Excellent work surpassing the expectations of the assignment and demonstrating initiative
and a willingness to move beyond the basic requirements of the assigned work.
C: Satisfactory work meeting all basic requirements of the assignment.
D: Work in some way less than satisfactory. Although conforming to basic requirements in
some way, the completed work is nevertheless not a coherent response to the
assignment.
F: A profoundly unsatisfactory performance which doesn't meet
the intent of the assignment at any level.