instructor: office hours:
Samuel Collins Room Li-318A
x3199
Wednesdays,
2-4 pm
(e-mail) scollins@towson.edu Fridays, 1-3 pm
homepage: www.towson.edu/~scollins or by appointment
course description
Ethnographic fieldwork has remained in dialectical tension with anthropological
theory for over
100 years. It is, therefore, the “practice of theory.”
The highly experiential world of
ethnographic research has the power to “penetrate” abstractions of
social theory--illuminating,
adumbrating, undermining. Of course, ethnography is not just
naive empiricism. It is theory that
directs the course of ethnographic fieldwork for, in the words of one
anthropologist, a “way of
seeing” is simultaneously a way of “not seeing,” i.e., aspects of life
selected through theory
require an anthropologist to ignore other, possibly puissant, areas
of social and cultural life.
“Anthropological theory” and “ethnographic fieldwork” move together,
one opening up a critical
space while another reveals a limit; one unveiling a contradiction
while another engenders new
possibilities and so on,
On another level, ethnographic fieldwork is a way of knowing intimately
related to everyday life, a
method that is very much an extension of our quotidian, phenomenological
experience. Whenever
we travel, begin a new job or attend a new school, we engage in something
very much like
ethnographic research. So although fieldwork is very much imbricated
by questions of
anthropological theory, it is also part of the everyday aesthetics
of living. In Paul Willis’s words,
art is “a defining and irreducible quality at the heart of everyday
human practices and interactions”
(3). In our interpretations of everyday life, we will need to
tap into our artistic sensibilities of the
everyday.
This course will, fittingly, adopt multiple perspectives on ethnographic
research. On the one
hand, we will consider ethnography’s relationship--historical and theoretical--to
cultural
anthropology. We will consider the historical development of
ethnography from early
experiments in the mid-nineteenth century up to the present and link
those putatively
methodological developments to theoretical debates (then and now) in
cultural anthropology.
We will also review experimentation in ethnographic methods as sometimes
oblique challenges to
anthropology’s status quo.
But we will also engage a great deal in the practice of ethnographic
research, structuring class
activities that bridge the gaps between everyday understanding and
experiential, ethnographic
knowledge. Additionally, students will take the first steps towards
their own ethnography,
following the building blocks of ethnographic research from the initial
proposal through the initial
site survey.
course objectives
1). Students will understand ethnographic methodology as arising in
a context of anthropological
theory.
2). Students will study contemporary (and even experimental) methodologies
through careful
readings of ethnographies.
3). Students will become familiar with qualitative methods germane
to the anthropological
encounter: participant observation, interviews, life stories and visual
anthropology.
4). Students will design an ethnographic project, set up research instruments
and attempt
nonintrusive observations.
required reading: The following books are available in the Towson University bookstore.
Fordham, Signithia. Blacked Out: Dilemmas of Race, Identity and
Success at Capital High.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Redfield, Peter. Space in the Tropics: From Convicts to Rockets
in French Guiana. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2000.
Willis, Paul. The Ethnographic Imagination. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2000.
recommended reading: The following is available at the Towson University bookstore.
Crane, Julia and Michael V. Angrosino. Field Projects in Anthropology:
A Student Handbook.
Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, Inc., 1992 [1984].
graded assignments
In-Class Assignments (Due on assigned days) Students will each complete
two, in-class
“projects” over the course of the semester. Projects will include
1) books reports; 2) acting as an
informant for “in-class” ethnographies; 3) engaging in and reporting
on truncated instances of
“fieldwork” inside or outside the class. We’ll begin in-class
assignments during week 3.
Research Proposals (Due February 15) Students must write a one-page
description of their
proposed ethnographic research project. Proposals should answer
the journalistic 4 Ws and 1 H
(Who, What, Where, When, Why and How).
Historical/Background Research (Due April 8) Students must complete
a five (5) page
background report on their research site. Essays should both
contextualize and historicize the
site, using relevant historical and archival sources. Students
should show how their particular
research question arises out of problems germane to the research site.
Ethnographic Reports (Due May 13) Using a modified (and less intrusive)
form of participant
observation, students will spend between 2-4 weeks engaged in ethnographic
research, after
which they will write a report summarizing method and analyzing data
(however perfunctory) in
the light of the aforementioned Historical/Background Research.
I will be handing out more
precise research guides later in the semester.
Final Examination (May 16) Students will demonstrate their knowledge
of class themes and
readings by answering a battery of true-false, multiple choice and
short answer questions.
class schedule:
1st Week
Introduction to the course and explanation of syllabus.
(1/28-1/30) Class Interviews
Assigned Reading:
Willis, viii-13
2nd Week
Varieties of Ethnographic Research.
(2/4-2/8) Assigned
Reading: Willis, 14-33
Redfield, pp. xiii-48
February 4: Change of Schedule Period Ends
3rd Week
The History of Anthropological Fieldwork
(2/11-2/15) Assigned Reading: Willis, 34-66
Redfield, 49-75
February 15: Research Proposals Due
In-class assignments begin
4th Week
Contemporary Anthropological Fieldwork
(2/18-2/22) Assigned Reading: Willis, 67-84
Redfield, 76-148
5th Week Challenges to the Anthropological Episteme
(2/25-3/1) Assigned Reading: Willis, 85-105
Redfield, 149-244
6th Week
Foundations of Ethnographic Research: Global histories in situ
Library Research
Methods
Assigned Reading:
Willis, 106-124
Redfield, 245-262
(3/4-3/8) Assigned
Reading: Willis, 125-130
Fordham, 1-38
7th Week Fieldwork: AA Predicament Turned Into a Method.@
(3/11-3/15) Assigned Reading: Fordham, 39-66
8th Week
(3/18-3/22) Assigned Reading: Fordham, 67-146
9th Week Spring Break
(3/25-3/29)
10th Week The Secret Lives of Informants
(4/1-4/5) Assigned Reading: Fordham, 147-234
April 5: Last
Day to Withdraw with a Grade of “W”
11th Week Participant Observation
(4/8-4/12) Assigned Reading: Fordham, 235-325
April 8: Historical
Background Essays Due
12th Week Scratchnotes, Fieldnotes and Journals
(4/15-4/19) Assigned Reading: Fordham, 326-344
13th Week Varieties of Interviews
(4/22-4/26)
14th Week Building Ethnographic Theory
(4/29-5/3)
15th Week Building Ethnographic Theory redux
(5/6-5/10)
16th Week Semester Review
(5/13) May 13:
Last Day of Classes
May 13: Ethnographic
Reports Due
May 16: Final
Examination, 12:30 p.m. -2:30 p.m.
grading
In-class assignments: 30%
Research proposal: 10%
Background paper: 20%
Ethnographic report: 30%
Final examination: 10%
notes
1. Although exams and graded work will remain as stated above,
I may have to change
different readings or films on the syllabus throughout the semester.
I will, in any case, try to give
you ample warning of any syllabus changes.
2. Each student should be familiar with the University’s rules regarding
cheating and
plagiarism (Towson University Undergraduate Catalog, Appendix F).
Neither will be tolerated in
my class and will result in a flunking grade.
3. Students with learning disabilities should register at the Disability
Support Services
Office.
explanation of grading
Following department policy, students will be assigned a letter grade
without a qualifying “+” or
“-“.
A: A superior performance surpassing assigned work in unique and novel
ways and
integrating diverse ideas from a wide range of sources in addition
to those discussed in
class.
B: Excellent work surpassing the expectations of the assignment and
demonstrating initiative
and a willingness to move beyond the basic requirements of the assigned
work.
C: Satisfactory work meeting all basic requirements of the assignment.
D: Work in some way less than satisfactory. Although conforming
to basic requirements in
some way, the completed work is nevertheless not a coherent response
to the
assignment.
F: A profoundly unsatisfactory performance which doesn't meet
the intent of the assignment at any level.